May 29, 2015

"Hanabi" part 2 for real

"Hanabi," the Japanese word for Honeybee,
has to be one of the coolest games I've played. Even moreso than my favorite game from childhood, "Dig hole under the fence."

Honeybee is a cooperative, multiplayer card game. Each card shows a honeybee of a certain color, as well as a number from 1 to five. The point of the purpose of the objective of the goal is to go around in a circle and play cards of the same color in ascending order. You can have multiple stacks of honeybees going at the same time, building all the colors simultaneously. BUT THE FUCKIN AWESOME KICKER is you cant see your cards WHOA WHAT HOLD THE FUCKIN TELEFONO

Here is a red honeybee. Did you know that honeybees cannot see red? Wouldn't THAT suck.


During your turn, you have the option to do one of three things. You can play a card, discard a card and gain more time, or you can give a player a clue, but this costs a timeage token. You are limited in the kinds of clues you can give. You can only provide information, such as "this card are a three" or "deez cards is blue." At this point, the player has to remember / decipher what the clue giver wants you to do - maybe they want you to play it? or discard? HMMM





Despite all the hexes that are so ubiquitous in board games, this honeybee is not making a honeycomb. Instead, this honeybee is exploding.

Cool-ass games like these deserve to win the big ole shpeel daz jars award thingie, which this one did in twothousandthirteen. HANDS DOWN (bahaha get it??) love this game, 12 out of 10 dentists would play this game again. Easy to learn, small, portable, very social deductiony minus the permanent destruction of friendships thing that comes with so many of these games.

I don't think any specific elements from this game would be directly steal-able to use in ours, other than the fact that it's fuckin awesome. so yea, I guess we're gonna steal the awesomeness.

May 26, 2015

"Hanabi" - hey look at this

"Hanabi," is cool and is a great game -
the end, thanks for reading.

May 23, 2015

"Splendor" - more like Splenbore

Who cares.
Honest question doe.

Do I not understand the definition of "fun" that these board game designers use? According to the worldwide infobahn, the board game Splendor "war nominiert für das Spiel des Jahres 2014 Rammstein Bratwurst Volkswagen Beetle Wolfenstein 3D," therefore, some people in some place thought this game was good or is fun. Fuck 'em.

Let me stop drinking this hatorade for one second to show you a picture.

One of the many beautiful gems that perfectly rocksonifies the feelings you have when playing this game.

What do the gems even have to do with anything? If you want to be the least shittiest player, the goal is to collect the mostest gems, then use these gems to buy various engines that in turn generates mo gems. Relevance and theme? irrelevant and irthemed. The game might as well be called "splenfork," where each resource is some form of silverware and you can buy silverware factories with your extra spoons. Or maybe "forkdor" where you do the same thing.




Another one of the many ugly rocks that remind me of this game.

Now that I've been on this splendor-shaped toilet for the past few paragraphs, I'm completely out of poo and physically am unable to shit on this game any more. The redeeming elements of this game were few and far between, but were honestly gratifying. This game is a distillation of the Engine Building game mechanic, where you gather resources that can be used to purchase resource generators, some of which are worth points. The fun of building an engine is a truly satisfying experience, as your economy represents the progress that you the player makes as a result of your previous decisions. Halfway through the game, you find yourself picking up low level cards (and victory points) for free. And just like the "missed encounters" section of craigslist, everyone loves that shit.

 Look at this ugly. Also, there's an ugly rock in the background.

To kinda take a step back from the giant pile of dookie, I loved the totally radical chips that represented the gemstones. They feel SO GOOD. Like that perfectly smooth and shiny pebble that you picked up a couple weeks ago and tried to sell on etsy as "art," but it turns out that you don't know how to etsy. Nice game components are so clutch to me. The giant, uncontrollably and unintentionally destructive dice from King of Tokyo, the cute cuddly panda from Takenoko, or these kickass clay chips, these components helps immerse the player into the game world, which is a good thing duh.

Overall, this game deserves to be head-butted and sent to hell. To me, the idea of engine building is entertaining and allows for interesting strategic thinking, but should be a component of another game, not a game itself.    

May 21, 2015

"Takenoko" - the game of being fat and looking cute

Did you know that a grown adult panda
can and will punch the ever living shit out of you? Having pandas around is a common cure for constipation. This is a little known fact that I just made up.

Being a panda is something that no one has ever fantasized about. That insatiable hunger for bamboo, the whole not ever getting sex thing, and the constant desire to punch people makes it one of the least desirable animals to be. It's no wonder that pandas as a species are so tired of being alive. But, I guess for those rare occasions when you feel like living the panda life without the incessant need to punch, this is one-third of a game for you.



As everyone knows, Takenoko is the Japanese word for "Do not Take a Ko." The game puts you in old-ass Japan, where you are trying to collect one of three different sets which are depicted on cards. Panda cards are completed when your panda-stomach is full of different types of bamboo. Farmer cards encourage you to grow stalks of bamboo to some specified height, while the third set requires you to build the world to fit a certain shape. The sets may interact with each others in unique ways, since you may both complete a panda set and farmer set at the same time HOW WEIRD AND WACKY.


What is a ghost panda's favorite food? BamboooooJUST FUCKING KIDDING it's tacos

This game is all about worker placement / set collection, a combination of concepts that seems to be pretty simple to introduce multiple elements of strategic decision making. The balance of randomness from dice rolls or card draws versus what other players do is heavily shifted towards the latter. A real game involves making decisions based off what has happened before your turn. Some would argue that games where your opponents decisions bear no impact on your thought process are not really games at all. Often times in Takenoko, your opponents will nom down all the bamboo that you need to complete one of your sets, and you'll want to make like a panda and punch them until poop goes flying everywhere.

What was so good about THIS particular collection of cardboard pieces?
THE ART. HOLY BUTT SPARKLES! ITS SO GOOD. Everything from the cuteness of the box art to the cuteness of the panda token radiates cuteness beams. The art style is cohesive and fairly minimalist, but seeing this box really sucks you in and before you even realize what the hell is going on, *SHAPOWZ* you're whipping out your massive credit card and flopping it onto the table for everyone to see. Although I really enjoyed the game mechanics overall, particularly the concept of multiple semi-antagonistic gameplay elements, to me the most appealing part of the game was the art.













May 18, 2015

May mechanics update - representation problem

PROGRESS BITCHES. 
Most of the time we say we're gonna talk about the game but end up thinking about what things we can eat, eating said things, and then having an in-depth discussion about the things we just ate. For the first time, we had a truly super productive discussion about the concepts that we are planning on incorporating into our boardgamething.

One major issue we had was a "Representation problem". We knew that each player would be able to recruit characters into their party, so by the endgame the character would be in control of multiple characters (In my mind I randomly picked 7, because random.) Each character you recruit into your party would give you one more action in the worker placement definition of "action," and each character card have to be represented in the game world by some kind of token. Being able to represent all 7 dudes in your party would be complicated, since each character token would have to be distinct in order to uniquely represent each character card. We figured we had 4 possible options to resolve this issue:

  • Have a unique character token for each character card in the deck. This allows the full complement of characters to still be available at any moment. Having recently played Betrayal at House on the Hill, we got slightly frustrated at the need to dig through a pile of small cardboard thingies, just to find a single thingie that we needed. Worse yet would be trying to find and match one out of 50 or 60 different small pictures of the dudes on the character cards. Needless to say, every time a character is recruited, this would result in a frustrating suck fest, and not the fun kind.
  • Nix character cards completely, and put all stats on the back of each character token. This is a pared down version of the character system. The biggest sacrifice was having to ditch the flavor text and details on the character themselves, essentially stripping out the theme of the characters and focusing on the mechanics. Having spent the most amount of time on the host of interesting and unique characters, this was not a least preferred option.
  • Restrict the party selection to one member of each of 7 "classes." For instance, on each character sheet, there's only one "General Captain Dude," there's one "Flying Wizard Man or Woman", etc. Each character card would have a designation of which class they belong to. This would actually really give a ton of strategic decision making, since each character would be forced to decide which character can fill each slot best. But, it would restrict the decisions in other ways, since each player wouldn't be able to stack their party with their favorite class.
  • Have each of the character tokens hold up a number, 1 through 7. This wildly cute idea could work, but it's clearly a cop out solution. It would allow each player to recruit 7 of anythings and build their party however they see fit, but it's not special in the slightest.

After the session, we decided to just have less characters available in the party.










May 15, 2015

"Carcassonne" - whatevs man

"CLASSIC EURO GAME BLAH BLAH" 
WHATEVER lets just say how disappointed I was to find out this game was not about turning your opponents meeples into carcasses. Instead, there was an awful lot of road building and cloistering. If cloistering isn't a euphemism for a dirty word, it really should be.

In many ways, the basic "world building" premise was similar to what we experienced with Betrayal at House on the Hill, except the odds of being chased by cannibals is a lot lower in Carcassonne. Also, you don't really interact with the world you build, the building itself is the game. Like SimCity without disasters, policemen, computers, cheat codes, basically nothing like SimCity. You grab a tile, throw it on the table as long as the roads / buildings connect with each other in a logical manner, and by the end of the game you collectively become the shittiest city planner in all of ancient france. Whenever you drop a tile, you have the option to throw one of your wooden dudes on the tile, either on the road, the city thing, or in the grass. Dudes thrown onto the grass are now farmers, which is offensively denoted by laying them down.


Have you heard of the new expansion, where all the meeples are replaced with dog-meeples? It's called "Barkassonne." 


You are limited in the number of meeples you can throw down, so it benefits you to wrap up whatever structure you're working on, so you can regrab your meeple and score those yummy victory points. Otherwise, your meeple gets stuck in this purgatory, whereby they can no longer earn any mo' points. This was a strategic concept I didn't fully learn until, i dunno, never.



Have you heard of the new expansion, where you can only play at night? It's called "Darkassonne."

Of all the games we have played in our journey into modern board games, this one by far had the greatest number of fluffy sheep and somehwat-above-average-sized trees. Because of this, we found the game really peaceful and relaxing - clearly we didn't understand the finer points of how to fuck your fellow players. Looking back on it, there were many moments where understanding the configurations of the tiles remaining would give one of us a huge advantage. Building useless paths and dead ends could block off another person from finishing a structure, therefore turning their already-placed meeple into a uselesseeple, unable to return to the hand to score more points. I imagine there is a high skill cap to this game, making it a highly competitive game. Once you know all of the tiles and how many of them are in play at any time, you can use this nollij to build offensively, preventing others from finishing their castles. Now ain't that some evil-ass shit.


Have you heard of the new expansion, where all the meeples are named "Mark"? It's called "Why the Fuck would Meeples have Namesassonne"

Hilariously, we all tried to play Carcassonne online later against each other, but turns out Carcassonne Castle is not the same game. Like, at all. First of all, you're blocked in by some dumb walls. The fun part about Carcassonne was the freedom to expand our countryside into some awful sprawl of a city full of incomplete buildings ala EVERY SUBURB IN TEXAS EVER. You can only play 1v1, which is equal parts lame and wack. And no fluffy sheep, so fuck that version. 

Stuff that was cool:

You kept track of score by moving a tracker around the board, but at the end, a whole poop-ton of extra points get distributed among the players based on resolving unfinished buildings and the farmers. There is a way to see who is currently ahead, but at the very end, there's this tense moment when you add up the score from the meeples who are still hanging around on your awful shaped countryside, and then tack these points onto your score. 

SURPRISE BITCH suddenly - you're not the winner anymore. It's got a very blue shell-Mario Kart feel to it. When you're losing, you do desperate things to try to score. Having a "hidden" score counter (which technically isn't hidden, you just gotta be REALLY good at counting.) makes gameplay interesting to me, since those desperate strategies might not ever come out.

To me this game is like your best friend from summer camp. It's cool to see it randomly, because at one point it was the dope hotness. Buuuut you really don't need to see it more than once. LOL SORRY FANBROS COME AT ME BROS.


Can someone send me a casual picture of Tony Stakassonne walking through a city parkassonne?

May 13, 2015

Game Master List

How We Doin

Played Games: 

  • Betrayal at House on the Hill
  • Alchemists
  • Carcassonne
  • King of Tokyo
  • Takenoko
  • Settlers of Catan
  • Splendor
  • Hanabi
  • Killer Bunnies
  • Ra
  • The Resistance

Games "On Deck" (ha, get it?):

  • Puerto Rico
  • Ticket to Ride
  • Dominion
  • Pandemic
  • Princes of Florence
  • One Night Ultimate Werewolf
  • Sherriff of Nottingham

 

Old-School Games/Misc-Maybe-Not-Board-Games-But-So-What:

  • Clue
  • Monopoly
  • Chess
  • Checkers
  • Mahjong
  • Mastermind
  • Dominos
  • Guess Who
  • Mancala
  • Jenga
  • Scrabble 
  • Uno
  • Spoons